💸 The End of Bank Secrecy: How “Transparency” Became a Tool for Control
We’re being told again about EU integration, transparency, modernization. But while some applaud — I read the next draft law carefully. Behind the polished language is another blow to Ukraine’s economy.
The bill aims to integrate Ukraine into the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA). On the surface — progress. In reality — deeper financial surveillance.
📜 What does the law propose?
🤔 What about account balances and transactions?
Formally — no. But with full access to account registries, banks, notaries, enforcement, and finmonitoring — detailed analysis is only a matter of time.
💡 Key question: why do we open up, but Europe doesn’t?
This is yet another case where Ukraine is told to open markets, systems, and data — while not getting equal treatment. Like Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” — open systems benefit those who already control the game. For smaller economies, “openness” means defeat.
🛑 Bank secrecy is not a crime. It is the foundation of trust.
In Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria, and Luxembourg — bank secrecy was for decades a magnet for capital. Even now, data disclosure happens only by court order and in rare cases.
In Ukraine, however:
That’s not transparency — it’s total fiscal control.
💸 What’s next?
💬 Transparency is great — but only if it’s mutual
Right now it’s: “You open up — we’ll decide what to take.”
We support honest markets — but not weaponized compliance against business.
⚖ As a lawyer, I must say:
This bill is a clear move toward financial centralization, loss of privacy, and rising conflict between the state and business. Soon it will impact anyone with a bank account — even salary cards.
Today, you must:
Respectfully, Managing Partner of WINNER Law Firm, PhD in Law, Attorney Ihor Yasko